Our Changing Language and Our Changing Times
I was almost through reading a book I was enjoying when I came across a sentence that made me stop and read it again. “A child should know that they are loved.” Yes, that was what it said. “Child,” a singular noun, was paired with a plural pronoun. The author was a well-respected magazine editor and writer of several books and scads of articles. How did he blunder like that? I did a little checking and found that it was no blunder. A lot of people are treating the language like that these days.
English teachers have always taught—yea, preached—that a pronoun is a substitute noun, and that a singular noun is referred to by a singular pronoun. “Child” is singular–one. “They” is plural, more than one. Putting child and they together is an obvious mismatch. But what is being done nowadays with pronouns is considered permissible and legal usage. The mismatch crept in to sidestep using “his or her” when the gender was unknown, as is true in the case of “child.” Some people consider using “his or her” cumbersome, but a lot of us consider not using it lazy. For a while I got a little put out with the well-known author for breaking the noun/pronoun rule, but after checking sources, I decided “not to worry.” That’s the way it’s done in this new age. We say whatever we want to. Language has always changed with time, and so our language is changing in many ways and will continue to change. But in some cases, it is being given a push and forced to change through carelessness, lack of knowledge, or a desire to satisfy new mores, such as adjusting to make room for gender nonconforming persons.
There are so many areas where the language is being bent and twisted in different ways from what was taught for generations. Social media, a more casual style of expression, can be blamed for some of these changes. Yet, some individuals, especially English teachers, still think that correct grammar and usage is important. I remember passing by a colleague’s office door and reading with a smile a cartoon posted there shortly after Barack Obama was elected president. The cartoon shows a crowd yelling “Yeah! Yeah!” A subdued onlooker asks, “Why are they so excited?” One from the crowd answers, “He knows grammar!” Yes, it’s possible to get excited about grammar. The Andrews Sisters, a popular singing group of the Fifties, had a hit song, “You Don’t have to Know the Language.” That’s just a song. It does matter if you know the language.
Language gives us clues about what a society is like. Linguists use language shifts and changes in vocabulary as historical markers to identify cultural patterns. The shifts often reflect what is happening in the society. Is our current mixup of tenses and pronoun references a sign of our confused, anything-goes world where people are doing what comes naturally? Language rules along with long-held values and expected acceptable behavior are falling by the wayside. I was in the checkout line at T.J. Max last week (I bought only one thing), and the woman behind me and I struck up a conversation. She was distressed that the young person who had come to work in their office wore jeans torn up at the knees. The lady bemoaned the fact that today some people seem to be unaware of appropriateness in dress, speech, and behavior in the workplace and elsewhere.
However, if you talk about a standard of dress or behavior, the question will come back at you, “Whose standard?” because a large segment of society believes everything is relative. They say that one’s idea of right and wrong is just as good as anybody else’s. If it’s right for me, that’s what matters. In Old Testament times when Israel was ruled by judges, it was said that “Everyone did what was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25). That seems to sum up the way things are today.
Changes in our language are inevitable, so are changes in our society, and we should be aware of both avenues of change. We, too, change, but as we change, let us not do what seems right in our own eyes, but have a deeper reason for what we do. No matter what occurs in the culture, we should not allow ourselves to be so overcome by the external shifts that we lose our bedrock values. As a part of God’s stable kingdom on earth, we can have discernment to make choices from a position of wisdom and strength.
Blessings,
Judith
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A poet is, before anything else,
passionately in love
with language
***W. H. Auden
4 Comments
Nanette Schell
Dear Judiith,
I have noticed time and time again how our language here in America is changing.
I am not a scholar like you but I know the difference when I see these changes.
Sometimes they are so annoying and seem to be the opposite to what teachers
taught us in junior school.
The American language has crept into the British language even though the
British do not realize this, and I chuckle when I hear the differences.
Change is everywhere whether we like it or not. I will stick to the old schooling.
Thank you again for bringing us up to date on the changing world.
Fondly,
Nan.
Judith Nembhard
Hi Nan,
Old English teacher here. I’m with you. I had a few examples of the changes, but deleted them at the last minute to give everyone less to read. But it is amazing how lazy people are, how deaf to what they are saying that is so incorrect. Anyway, we can handle the changes–just stick to our old ways.
Blessings to you, my dear. JN
Fartema Fagin
This generational shift of mores, even in language, is a shaky situation. This millennial generation seems so acceptable and easily adaptable to this ‘shift.’
My niece and step granddaughter introduced me to the ‘they’ identity. One called it ‘fluidity’ of genders.
I recently listened to a sermon online (a family member’s church). The speaker was a young elder in training using ‘street’ language. I questioned it. “Did your pastor get ‘hijacked’ from the pulpit?”
The first lady of the church said they hoped to reach the youth in the streets – outreach ministry.
A few years ago, I attended a service at my home church, the young pastor introduced his sermon with a ‘hip-hop’ rap. I wanted to leave the sanctuary, but endured the message. Besides, it was a youth day service.
Body language, gestures, can easily be misinterpreted, but let’s be clear; grammatically, he or she is ‘singular’, not plural as in ‘they’.
Judith Nembhard
Fartema, you sound adamant on the point of correct use of “he or she” and not “they.” I wish the majority were in your (our) camp. It’s a different day, but we can’t give in.
You always have something constructive to say in your comment. I hope others will read and heed your words. JN